Skip to Content

Why I won’t be boycotting travel to Myanmar

Myanmar has been in the international news a lot the past couple of weeks, and it hasn’t been for the glorious stupa-dotted landscape of Bagan or the tranquil waters of Inle Lake. It’s been for the religious and ethnic persecution of the Muslim Rohingya minority of Rakhine State by the Burmese army and militia groups, and the response, or lack thereof, on the part of the Myanmar government.

The Rohingya are a Muslim minority that have been living in Rakhine State, part of modern-day Myanmar, for centuries. During British rule (1824-1948), there was a surge in Rohingya migration, labourers coming to Rakhine State from what is today’s India and Bangladesh. The living conditions of the Rohingya, who are mainly concentrated in western Rakhine State, are among the poorest in the world.

Since independence, the situation for the Rohingya has gone from bad to worse, starting with only limited access to identity cards, to legislation that has essentially rendered them stateless. The Burmese army and Buddhist supremacist militia have long sought to eradicate Myanmar of the Rohingya and have been exercising systematic violence akin to war crimes and ethnic cleansing with view to complete genocide.

It is approximated that 1 million Rohingya are currently living in Myanmar, while another one million more have fled to neighboring countries since the 1970s. The latest wave of intense violence started on 25 August 2017, when Rohingya militants belonging to a group called the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (Arsa) attacked police posts in northern Rakhine, resulting in 12 deaths. In retaliation, the Burmese army with the backing of Buddhist militia have launched a “clearance operation” that have razed villages to the ground, and raped and murdered over a thousand civilians – men, women and children. More than 300,000 Rohingya have fled Myanmar in the past three weeks alone.

It is a humanitarian crisis that is being likened to the Srebrenica massacre in Bosnia, and I cannot express enough my complete and unequivocal condemnation of these war crimes, and my utter disappointment in the response of Aung San Suu Kyi and her government. But unlike many who have taken to social media to express their desire to never lay a foot (again) in the country, I am not going to join you in boycotting travel to Myanmar and here’s why.

The violence occurring in Rakhine State is not new

While much of the world is just learning of the persecution of the Muslim Rohingya occurring in Rakhine State, it is a situation that has been ongoing for decades. Of course, it is one that categorically and without question must stop. But, I ask you, is boycotting the country outright the solution?

Myanmar has only really opened up to tourism over the past several years, the lack of tourists nor their spending never stopped the slaughter of innocent people before, and unfortunately it won’t now either.

Change will only come if we engage

While a travel boycott may not do much in realistic terms to stem military violence, I know many of you want to make a stand from a moral perspective. I completely understand you, I really do. But as much as I make similar pledges to all kinds of causes, I’m not sure disengaging with an entire country will have the desired effect.

For one, let’s think about how we’ve come to know so much about this issue and others that are going on in Myanmar. It is through increased media access and people like you and I on the ground sharing what we see and hear. Cutting off this flow of information will not make the government or the military more accountable; it will only serve to allow them to fulfill their abhorrent agenda behind closed doors. We need to keep international attention on this and we can only do so through maintaining a dialogue.

Who will benefit from a boycott?

It certainly won’t be the hundreds of thousands of people across the country who rely on tourism for their livelihoods – the family-run guesthouses and restaurants, the guides or the local tour operators. As much as the Myanmar government profits from tourism, they will not be crippled by a boycott; it will be the people of Myanmar who are.

If Myanmar recedes back into its days of isolation, whether because the military quashes the quasi-democracy and reinstates martial law, or the world seeks a travel boycott, we lose the chance to make real change in Myanmar, and we take away the capacity of everyday citizens of the country to engage with the world, have their voices heard and to learn about issues such as human rights.

The people of Myanmar too want change

When we visited Myanmar in May this year, we spoke to many local people who held great hopes for the future. They know Myanmar faces many problems and they didn’t all end in November 2015 with the first democratically elected civilian government in 50 years. But they were riding high on the hope of change and already felt as if their lives were better off open to the world.

Cutting off the country from our tourism is more than just about economics; it’s about saying that Myanmar, and all its people, are on their own. And can we really say in the current state of global politics that the actions of our governments always represent the will of the people?

The fall from grace of Aung San Suu Kyi

One of the biggest stories coming out of Myanmar is not just of the atrocities in Rakhine State, but the response of the government to the military violence. State Counsellor, Foreign Affairs Minister and national figurehead Aung San Suu Kyi’s lack of condemnation of the military’s actions there, and blaming of Rohingya “terrorists”, has led to a public outcry and calls for her Nobel Peace Prize to be revoked. Her silence has been a slap in the face to those who fought so long and hard for her release from house arrest and a complete turnaround on the principles of human rights she has built her platform on, and it makes me fear for the country’s future.

Myanmar’s peace is volatile, and despite her lack of absolute power, I feel like Aung San Suu Kyi was a point of social cohesion. In a country full of ethnic tension, she was the one thing most people could agree on. Traveling around Myanmar, many people were happy to talk openly about politics and they beamed to know we had heard about “The Lady”. Even the mention of her name instilled a sense of pride. Wasn’t she supposed to be different?

Of course, we have no idea what might be going on behind the scenes or what kind of threats may have been made against her. Instead of a democratically elected leader, Aung San Suu Kyi has become more of a puppet to the military regime her party supposedly overthrew, and it seems highly likely that someone is pulling those strings. Yet her lack of condemnation, at the very least, hasn’t sat well with those who placed such faith in her as the moral compass Myanmar’s leadership so desperately needed.

Without Aung San Suu Kyi in the hearts of the people, where does that leave a country emerging into the global spotlight after decades of isolation and in a state of such political fragility?

I have read reports, however, and I’d love to hear from the people of Myanmar about this, that the persecution of the Rohingya has actually been a rallying point for the nation. That the ethnic Burmese majority is, in fact, largely in support of the military’s actions towards the Rohingya and Aung San Suu Kyi’s response. If this is indeed true, then maintaining contact with the people of Myanmar has never been more vital.

Where we might end up

What many tourists don’t know is that the Rohingya are not the only minority to be persecuted by the Burmese military. There are civil conflicts going on in various regions and some ceasefires only dangle by a thread. And while the Rohingya crisis requires urgent action, if we truly stand for human rights, the very rights we so vocally want to claim for the Rohingya, then we can’t be selective about which segments of the Myanmar populace are deserving of them. Saying ‘Screw Myanmar!’ because of military, Buddhist militia and government actions may send Myanmar back to the days of full-on military dictatorship and into a phase of ethnic and religious conflict that will set the country back decades.

While I don’t think boycotting tourism to the nation outright is a solution, I do believe we can use our tourist dollars in more strategic ways that don't threaten the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands and cutting Myanmar off from the world again. Our visits should focus on veering as much of our spending away from government hands and into locally-run businesses, and keeping an open dialogue with the people of Myanmar, sending a clear message to those inciting violence that the world is watching, and assuring those trying to fight it that we are fighting right there along with them.

What's your opinion on the Rohingya crisis and the idea of a travel boycott?

For those interested in further reading about travel boycotts, I recommend this post by World Nomads, Controversial Destinations: To Boycott or Not?

I welcome discussion in the comments, however, please keep the conversation civil. Any comments deemed to go against the constructive community space we have created here, will be deleted.

Your Ultimate Guide to a Grand Sumo Tournament in Japan
← Previous
5 Things to do in Nyaungshwe, Myanmar (that aren't a boat tour)
Next →

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nimora Kyi

Wednesday 31st of July 2019

I came across this blog by accident and spent much time on reading Comments as well: most of which are full of hatred. While the media and whole world is trumpetting only on the Rohingya issue, other Burmese people are suffering in somewhere esle too. Political situation in Myanmar is way complicated where many ethnic groups have been fighting against Myanmar government since her independence from British colony. Aung Sann Suu Kyi governemnt is facing the hardest challenge ever in the History and of course She simply cannot sort out all of those problems under her Magic Wand during her short term in office. Military Government could manage to survive for years while the whole world and UN imposed Sanction. As long as China and Russia are at the back of Myanmar government, Boycotting simply won't work and it will even lead to worst. The whole world should see the feeling and hopes of ordinary Myanmar citizens too, as you do.

Calvin Pei

Thursday 8th of November 2018

The people of Myanmar need to learn the difference between fiction and facts. The threat of false information (I refuse to call it "fake news" because it's attached to Trump) has infiltrated this country. It was a major contributing factor to the genocide. It was no different than the radio announcer in Rwanda telling listeners to kill Tutsi. For this and other reasons, I cannot visit a country with people ignorant to the truth. Technology is a threat when people don't know how to use it. I'm sure they're lovely people, but what's to stop the military from considering an outsider, like me, to be a threat? If the military are capable of horrific acts to people, why would I want to take a chance? I will not visit that country that is controlled by the military. The military is accountable to no one, and they have all the guns.


Wednesday 22nd of August 2018

I will be traveling to Southeast Asia in 2 weeks, in an effort to find a role for me that aids the Rohingya. I am looking to learn more and more about this crisis, but am weary to travel to Myanmar, knowing my dollars could very well fund those who are slaughtering people, raping women, burning children... I do, however, want to visit the refugee camps in Cox's Bazar, to get a more in-depth look at the current situation/problems they are facing. Does anyone know how I might be able to get into the refugee camps? I'm having a difficult time with this.


Monday 19th of March 2018

I have been to Myanmar many times now. And it has been wonderful every time. I have witnessed the change from a military dictatorship to a more democatic society. Many facets of life is still controlled by the military and the government has no real influence on that. So it is dubious to say the least to blame the Lady for ot openly speaking out. Anyone who takes the time to study this transition will grasp that. By the way, the Lady (Daw means lady or madam in Myanmar language) was for decades the way the people referred to Aung San Suu Kyi as it was dangerous to openly talk about her. So it has nothing to do with 'her pride'! Apart from the military intervention one has to understand the background of the Rohingya problem too. The bulk of it is illegal immigration from Bangladesh and as there were already so many problems in the country due to groups fighting for independency (caused by the promisses by and bad intentions of British) that went on for decades. I do not agree with or condone the violence, but we have to understand backgrounds before taking a standpoint. There is more than meets the eye here. In any case I love the people and their Buddhist ways of living.

veoux jp

Friday 24th of November 2017

May I join your dreams? If the Rohingas are not from the place where they are persecuted for decades and should get out, why the Burmese will not have to withdraw in there state (between tangoo and mandalay) and let ALL others minorities have their own countries and independence? That is what they deserve after more than 50 years during which the Burmese people were unable to fix their problems with their army. Why should they just look back from independence? Let's check history as a hole! Not just like they wish! That's my dream. That the Burmese move back to the place they belong to. Not only the Burmese soldiers, but also their teachers and business men and give back the land to the minorities that were first. I love this country. But my love go to the weakest. This is the voice of my heart. I cry when I read news. I can go there again soon. But I don't want to cry for 1 month. The chiefs of this army are so powerful now that whatever tourists do will not change anything. You want to change the world? Then first try to change yourself. These tyrannic people are the one that I have the most pity. They have small (if any) idea of what is life. The soldiers that rape and kill the children, who do you think they are? They can be the one that have been stolen to their parents by the army when they were child. They are not able to understand what they do. Judging is the best way to miss understanding. Boycotting or not boycotting is judging so be careful. If you are brave enough (what I am not) go there. But please kill a dictator for me. It will be very good for your Karma...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.